Friday, April 18, 2014

Thomas Newman's Use of Range and Orchestration in "The Shawshank Redemption"

Let me start by saying this: I think The Shawshank Redemption score is one of two things, either a meticulously thought out masterpiece, or an example of an exceptional composer letting his instincts guide him to create a score that sounds and feels meticulously thought out.  The reality is probably somewhere in the middle.  I've seen this particular movie in the hundreds of times, and I sincerely believe I am not using hyperbole.  I've listened to the album probably even more times, and each time I notice something new, and every time I am blown away.

What gets me is the way Newman uses range to keep us grounded in the harsh reality of prison life.  Lets look at an example, shall we?

Observant viewers will notice that Boggs does not, in fact, say "fuck off" when he enters the room.  What a dick.


First off, and it's hard to hear here, when does the music start?  To my ears it's right when Boggs pulls out that nasty looking shank, already Newman is giving us some serious information - Andy is literally on the floor and the music is rumbling in a barely audible register informing us of his subjugation to Boggs.  The range continues to rumble for most of the duration of the scene, we gain some middle ground in the strings when Andy starts to taunt Boggs about his reading skills, and while the cluster tells us that Andy is still pretty screwed, he's not quite subjugated like we originally thought.  Then Boggs throws the shank and beats the crap out of Andy to a lovely voiceover by Morgan Freeman, and here is where Newman does something truly remarkable.  That melancholy oboe enters, a reminder of Andy's former freedom, and his hope - strained at the top of its range, attempting to break away, but completely unable.  The camera then focuses on Boggs while he is in the hole, and subsequently being released, and the music returns to the middle in the piano and English Horn, now the music comes to us from Boggs's perspective, he likes prison, he can thrive and so the instruments around him are in comfortable ranges, while the harmonies give us insight into his rather unsavory character.  Two distinct musical techniques describing two things at the same time, and the result is deeply moving and powerfully upsetting.  But Newman isn't done yet, oh no, he's just getting started.  The music continues to come to us from Boggs's perspective, and something bad is about to happen to him.  That high oboe returns and when Boggs sees Byron Hadley standing in his cell, we know, because the music has told us, that Boggs's time being "free" within prison is absolutely done.  Newman again shifts our musical perspective and gives us a powerful rumble in the piano for Boggs while the English Horn returns to the middle along with the piano right at the moment Boggs is framed within the railing (he looks like he's in prison because he is no longer free to do as he pleases), we are Andy again, and justice is being served.  However, in prison, justice is never a pleasant sight to behold.

In fact, Newman uses the same techniques again later in the film to play with our sense of hope while Andy and Red speak candidly about Zihuatenejo and Andy's thoughts about freedom.  Let's take a look.



Newman plays with us a little differently this time, using primarily the piano to essentially tell us the outcome of the story before we've seen it.  He begins with two oscillating chords as Andy asks Red if he thinks he'll ever get out of prison.  Red responds with doubt, saying he'll be an old man, and the music reflects his doubt, like the music stuck between two chords, Red is trapped within the walls of Shawshank State Prison.  But then Andy starts talking about Zihuatenejo and the music undergoes a paradigm shift.  Suddenly we have melody, and a beautiful one at that.  It does not feel devoid as the "Stoic" theme does, but rather it feels, it emotes, and Newman tells us in that moment that Andy will escape.  That oboe returns, still in the highest fringes of its register, signaling to us that Andy's freedom will come none too easily, and that great work is to be done, but it's not accompanied by a piano forcefully pulling us down to the reality of prison, no, this time we are able to feel as though the oboe may finally be free.  The camera then turns to Red, and we return to those two chords from the opening of the cue, but we're still looking at this from Andy's perspective and so Newman returns almost instantaneously to Andy's hope theme.  During this exchange Red expresses doubts, and Andy attempts to discourage those doubts, therefore we are still in the world of Andy's hope.

Then Newman gives us some insight into what is going on behind Red's words.  He's talking about how he couldn't survive, but the truth is, for the first time in years, he's considering what life on the outside might really be like, and he's only able to do so because of the thought of facing it with his friend.  The film isn't about Andy's redemption, he was always a good man, if a little cold, the film is about Red's redemption, I sincerely believe that.  Red is the one who learns to hope, and through friendship becomes a man who can face what he did and see how foolish it really was.  Newman's music, simply by bringing in a string section ennobles Andy, and Red along with him.  But Red is not yet fully redeemed by the power of Andy's hope, and as he proclaims that "these are just shitty pipe dreams" we are grounded to those repeating chords again.  For this time, Red's doubt has won out over his hope, and so the music returns to the predictable, just like the routine of life "on the inside."

This brings us to the scene where Andy escapes, take a look.



Notice right off the bat, we hear those two oscillating chords.  When Andy looks at the poster however, the piano does something miraculous - it starts to move, not only rhythmically but in range as well, we move to the middle, and even to what could be called the top.  It's now or never, and Andy's freedom has never been so close.  Newman states the "stoic" theme twice in the low strings, a testament to Andy's always thoughtful and analytic mind, he will need it if his plan is going to work.  The theme grows, now the full string section is involved, and it becomes an anthem for Andy's escape - his cold calculation, his thoughtful demeanor, all the things that got him into this mess, are going to meld with his undying hope and finally be his salvation.  And then Andy crawls through a literal river of shit, and Newman paints it as a grueling struggle.  He continues the steady growth of the stoic theme, adding in trombones and horns, occasional dissonances rock the tonal world as Andy comes closer and closer to escape, and then finally, it happens.  As Andy stands, and embraces the rain, we hear brass in a choir for the first time in the entire film.  In fact, before Andy enters the waste removal pipe there is no brass at all.  Newman gives us freedom: that unattainable truth has been hiding in the brass section the entire time.  He adds a whole new color to help us (and Andy) believe what may be the unbelievable, Andy is free.  The journey was literally hell (and pretty shitty *rimshot!*) but he is baptized in both the rain and brass, and comes out clean, absolved of all sins.  It's not a subtle metaphor, and so the music isn't subtle either.

Now Red needs to be absolved, and at the end of the film he is.



Three things herald Red's redemption: the oboe moves to its most comfortable range, the strings are allowed to soar, and the "Redemption" theme appears for the second time time, having only been heard once before, when Andy secured the beer for the work detail.

How do they occur?  The oboe first appears in the middle, comfortable register, when Red finishes reading the letter and he folds it up, he's made up his mind, he has allowed himself to be freed of his dependence on the walls, and hope has filled his soul.  While Andy is baptized by the ringing of the trumpet, Red's baptism is significantly more subdued, by the intonation of an oboe.  Red then leaves his mark upon his boarding house room with the words "So was Red," the strings are finally let free to move to their highest ranges in a beautiful melodic fashion.  See, while Brooks left though suicide, Red left through hope and friendship and so his new theme, a theme for his redemption is allowed to soar, as he is soaring, into the highest comfortable registers of the violin section.  Red's transformation, his baptism, or most obvious, his redemption is complete, and Newman's score played no small role.

Saturday, April 5, 2014

A Revisionist History of the Music from Star Trek


Do me a favor will you?  Watch this clip twice (you can start at 1:45 to get to the real point of the matter).  Once right now.  Go.  I'll wait.

Did you watch it?  Pretty great, right?

Now I'm going to talk to you and you're going to watch it again.

Firstly, lets get something straight.  I think Star Trek: The Motion Picture possesses one of the finest film scores of all time, and I'll fight anyone who disagrees (and bet against myself so I can take advantage of what I'm pretty sure is negative muscle mass at this point).

Although most people know you can beat this guy with a swift kick to the balls, Johnny Cage style!


For you kids who were born after 1995 that was a Mortal Kombat joke.  Killed it.

Anyway, I think this movie and its score get a bad rap in some circumstances.  The Motion Picture (TMP from this point forward) was a direct response to Star Wars by Paramount, but what most people fail to realize is that it has a lot more in common with Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey than it does with Star Wars at all.  This comparison can go right down to the score.

Goldsmith's score, which is a masterpiece, if you disagree you're wrong (no time for opinions when it comes to truly great music), draws not from the bombast of Korngold like Williams does, but rather from the contemporary music scene.  We've got improvised synthetic sounds, which Goldsmith dubbed the "Blaster Beam," extended techniques like horns blowing through their mouthpieces backwards, and very atmospheric writing, something Williams would tackle in The Empire Strikes Back but really doesn't do in Star Wars (aside from a blatant Rite of Spring quotation).

All of those things are great, and they make Goldsmith's score stand out as the clear masterwork between the two entries into Sci-Fi music, but what about this tune?

Clearly Goldsmith is influenced by Korngold here, for he produces a tune of stunning magnitude: heroic, brassy, 6/8 - everything required to make us feel like we're soaring through space at Warp 8, baby!

So who's, or what's theme is it?  Is it a theme for The Enterprise herself?  It's possible, by 1979 Star Trek fans had made the Enterprise a legend.  Is it a theme for Kirk?  Again, certainly possible, Kirk is the ultimate hero, cocky, smart, talented.  But I think it's neither.  It's a love theme.

At this point in his life the only thing Kirk truly loves is his ship.  It's been several years since The Enterprise completed her historic five year mission under Kirk and his crew has moved on.  He's an admiral, a new kid is in command, Spock is on Vulcan, and Bones is retired from Starfleet.

And has a totally bitchin' '70s getup complete with beard.

Look at how Kirk looks at the ship.  Isn't that how every man has felt about his car at some point?  But this goes deeper.  Kirk owes his life to that ship, not just the fact that he's alive, but everything of worth he has ever done is connected to it.  This is a romantic relationship, shit, in IMudd Kirk even calls the Enterprise a "beautiful woman."  He's got the hots for that piece of tritanium alloy, and Goldsmith knew it.  So when Kirk first sees the ship, it's not a brassy fanfare statement (although we get there), it's a beautiful, subdued, love theme for Kirk seeing the love of his life for the first time in years.  She's different, she's gotten a makeover (thank God someone took a look at that original model and said "We can make this waaaayyyyy cooler), but underneath she's the same ship that helped Kirk trick bad guys, kill Romulans, and bang green alien chicks.  Understandably, he's smitten.

Watch the clip again.  Total love song, amirite?

But an era of films for the franchise meant there was no worry of cancellation, and with the outrageous earnings of this film, a sequel was all but obvious.  So we get The Wrath of Khan with a new composer, and a much darker theme.  From there we have The Search for Spock and The Voyage Home.  Everyone talks about the II, III, and IV as the Star Trek trilogy, but really it's the first four films making a quadrilogy.  So in an era of films, finally some character development!

The first four films have a pretty solid emotional arc for Kirk:  Love - Loss - Sacrifice - and Acceptance (with a little fear of old age and revenge thrown in for good measure).  

Kirk loves the Enterprise more than anything, that clip shows us that.  Whatever affection we know Kirk has for Spock and Bones is eclipsed by that ship, healthy or not (hint: it's not).  But a funny thing happens in The Wrath of Khan: Kirk loses his closest friend and starts to realize that maybe it's not all about that ship.  He starts to see a life beyond the Enterprise in that moment, a life where his duty to Starfleet can be parallel or even secondary to his love for his friends.  In The Search for Spock Kirk gets another nasty wake-up call with the death of his only son, whom he had just met, at the hands of the villainous Klingons.  And in that same movie Kirk makes a choice.  He can die along with his crew and he can forget about saving Spock, or he can sacrifice the ship, his one true love.

He destroys his ship.

In those moments while the Enterprise crashes to the surface of the Genesis Planet Kirk becomes more than he had ever been before, a caring, compassionate, well adjusted human being.  In later films we don't see the brazen cocksure Kirk of the original series, no he's gotten old, he's seen too many things, and he finally knows what matters.  In Star Trek V, it is with reluctance that he allows his ship to venture into the unknown, he's not wild about losing his friends to a madman's search for God.  In Star Trek VI, he surrenders to save his crew even though he knows he did nothing wrong, and faces death in the Alien's Graveyard.

What if Goldsmith had scored all of these films instead of just two of them?

I love Horner's score for The Wrath of Khan but at times I wonder how it would be with Goldsmith's sweeping love theme transforming before our eyes as Kirk finally views his love for the Enterprise as it really is.

I think if Goldsmith had done all of the films his tune would have found less and less place in the films, replaced by new themes, and developed to represent a full grown Kirk.  No longer the pompous big deal it is when it reappears in Star Trek V but rather a beautiful reminder of a love that was, and the man it helped create.

This is just what I think would have happened, but I think I'm right.